Comparison

Idenplane vs Auth0

Idenplane is an open-source, self-hosted alternative to Auth0. Where Auth0 is a managed SaaS you pay for per monthly active user, Idenplane runs on your own infrastructure under the AGPL-3.0 license — with no per-MAU pricing and no vendor lock-in — while implementing the same standards (OAuth 2.0 + PKCE, OpenID Connect, SAML 2.0) and shipping 10 official SDKs across web, mobile, and backend. You trade Auth0’s fully-managed convenience for full control of your data, predictable cost, and the ability to self-host in about 30 seconds.

Feature by feature

Idenplane vs Auth0, compared

Auth0 is managed SaaS, so deployment rows are marked N/A rather than unsupported. Open a PR if anything is out of date.

Feature comparison between Idenplane and Auth0 as of 2026-05
Feature
Idenplane
Auth0
Deployment
Self-hosted (on your infra) 1 N/A
Hosted / managed option
Open source
Docker one-liner 1 N/A
Kubernetes / Helm 1 N/A
Horizontal scaling
Protocols
OAuth 2.0 + PKCE
OpenID Connect 1.0
SAML 2.0
Device authorization
Step-up authentication
MFA & Passwordless
TOTP (authenticator app)
WebAuthn / FIDO2
Recovery codes
Brute-force protection
Identity
Multi-tenant realms
B2B organizations
RBAC (roles & groups)
LDAP / Active Directory
Social & enterprise IdP
Custom attributes
Developer Experience
Modern admin console
REST API
Web SDKs (React / Vue / Angular)
Mobile SDKs (iOS / Android)
CLI tool
Webhooks
Plugin / extension system ~
Operations
Prometheus metrics
Health-check endpoints
Rate limiting
Audit logging
Realm / tenant theming ~
Implementation language TypeScript N/A (SaaS)
Memory under load 4 ~150 MB N/A
Local-dev setup time 4 ~30 sec ~2 min
Official SDK count 10 10+
Pricing model AGPL-licensed Freemium $$$
Full support
Partial / paid tier
Not applicable (SaaS)
Not available
  1. Auth0 and Clerk are managed SaaS — self-hosting is not an option, not an absence. Marked N/A in deployment rows.
  2. Memory and setup-time figures are from internal k6 load tests (50 virtual users, 60s, single realm, default config) — not idle measurements. Idenplane and Keycloak ran the identical workload; SuperTokens, Auth0, and Clerk figures are estimates, not benchmarked. Workload dictates real-world usage.

Snapshot as of . Suggest a correction

Key differences

Why teams leave Auth0

Self-hosted and open source

Idenplane runs on your own infrastructure under the AGPL-3.0 license. Auth0 is a closed, fully-managed SaaS — you can’t run it yourself or read its source.

No per-MAU pricing

Auth0 bills by monthly active users, so costs scale with your growth. Idenplane has no per-user fee: you pay for the infrastructure you already run, and nothing else.

Own your identity data

With Idenplane, user credentials and profiles stay in your database and your region — useful for data-residency and compliance requirements. With Auth0, that data lives in Auth0’s cloud.

Same standards, 10 SDKs

Idenplane implements OAuth 2.0 + PKCE, OpenID Connect, and SAML 2.0, with 10 official SDKs across web, mobile, and backend — so migrating keeps your protocol integrations intact.

No vendor lock-in

Because Idenplane is standards-based and self-hosted, you’re never tied to one vendor’s roadmap, pricing changes, or deprecations.

Where Auth0 still leads

Auth0 is fully managed — no servers to run or patch — with a large integration marketplace, enterprise support and SLAs, and a broad set of compliance certifications. If “someone else runs it” is the priority, Auth0 is hard to beat.

Moving off Auth0?

Our migration guide covers exporting users, mapping tenants to realms, and swapping the SDK — so you can cut the bill without losing the developer experience.

Read the Auth0 migration guide